• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Hmm, the real question is whether this is consistent year over year… beating the S&P500 one year doesn’t really indicate anything.

      Also there are 535 people in the US congress but only like 30 on these two lists… and not the same 30 both years. How many lost money in those same years?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The list is much longer if you search for it, that’s hysterical the ones above and close to the same return as SPY

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Assuming you meant “historical”, then these two years of data imply that ~5% of congress members beat the S&P500 per year, and not the same people every year… which seems statistically insignificant.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t know what happened with my auto correct on that word as I think I meant to say “only” 🤔

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ah, well there you go then… 25ish people out of 535?

              Again, it’d be worrying if the same people were consistently ahead of the market… but that would also be super obvious.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yep, people make a big thing out of it and maybe the proportion of them that beat SPY is higher than the proportion of random investors that do it, but there’s no good way to say 🤷

            • GenEcon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Thanks! This completly debunks the insider trade myth. You would expect a Gaussian distribution around the mean, which would be a market neutral index. And you get even a slightly to the left shifted Gaussian bell curve.